Revisiones taxonómicas, ciencia de frontera y programas nacionales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/bys3.6-23Palabras clave:
ignorancia, Linneo, México, turbo-taxonomíaResumen
Para incentivar la propuesta de un programa nacional en taxonomía, se consideran cuatro aspectos fundamentales. Uno, la importancia de las revisiones taxonómicas ya que, al transformar la calidad de la investigación, son análogas a la piedra filosofal de los alquimistas. Dos, que las revisiones (y la taxonomía) deben considerarse como ciencia de frontera porque persiguen abatir la ignorancia. Tres, que dado que no conocemos la mayor parte de la biota planetaria debemos incrementar los esfuerzos de investigación en esa dirección, incluyendo enfoques de turbo-taxonomía. Cuatro, que debemos organizarnos mejor en una iniciativa nacional, encabezada por CONACYT y la UNAM, en la que se impulsen proyectos coordinados de alcance nacional.
Descargas
Citas
Boero, F. 2015. We need monographs, and revisions. Italian Journal of Zoology, 82: 149-150. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/11250003.2015.1041718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11250003.2015.1113731
Bolton, B. 2007. How to conduct large-scale taxonomic revisions in Formicidae; pp 52-71 In Snelling, R. R., Fisher B. L. y Ward P. S. (eds), Advances in Ant Systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Homage To E. O. Wilson – 50 Years of Contributions. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 80. https://www.antwiki.org/wiki/images/6/6e/Bolton%2C_B._2007a.pdf
Briggs, J.C. 2017. Emergence of a sixth mass extinction? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122: 243-248. https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/122/2/243/3869095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blx063
Britz, R., Hundsdörfer, A. y Fritz, U. 2020. Funding, training, permits – the three big challenges of taxonomy. Megataxa, 1: 49-52. https://www.biotaxa.org/megataxa/article/view/megataxa.1.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.10
Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. (reimpr. 1965 con introducción y 5 apéndices. National Science Foundation, 220 pp. https://nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA361303
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R. y Dirzo, R. 2017. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30): E6089-E6096. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
Coleman, C.O. 2015. Taxonomy in times of the taxonomic impediment – Examples from the community of experts on amphipod crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 35: 729-740. doi.org/10.1163/1937240X2381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-00002381
Dubois, A. 2010. Taxonomy in the century of extinctions: taxonomic gap, taxonomic impediment, taxonomic urgency. Taprobranica, 2: 1-5. doi.org/10.4038/tapro.v2i1.2702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v2i1.23
Hutchings, P. 2017. An advocate for taxonomic research in Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology, Special Issue, pp A-C.
Lamothe-Argumedo, R. 1989. Problemas y perspectivas de la taxonomía zoológica en México. Ciencias, 3: 44-54. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/cns/article/view/11017
Liedo, J.P. y Salazar-Vallejo, S.I. 2010. La relevancia del Sistema CONACYT en la actividad científica. EcoFronteras, 38: 18-20.
Lücking, R. (+ 52 coautores). 2016. Turbo-taxonomy to assemble a megadiverse lichen genus: seventy new species of Cora (Basidiomycota: Agaricales: Hygrophoraceae), honouring David Leslie Hawksworth’s seventieth birthday. Fungal Diversity, 84: 139-207. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13225-016-0374-9.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0374-9
Magalhaes, I.L. 2019 Spreasheets to expedite taxonomic publications by automatic generation of morphological descriptions and specimen lists. Zootaxa, 4624: 147-150. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4624.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4624.1.12
Maxted, N. 1992. Towards defining a taxonomic revision methodology. Taxon, 41: 653-660. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1222391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1222391
McGuinness, W. 2015. The future of scientific thought. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 45: 95-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2015.1013142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2015.1013142
Meierotto, S., Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N., Chapman, E.G. y Smith, M.A. 2019. A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 66: 119-145. DOI 10.3897/dez.66.34683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34683
Mora, C., Tittensor, D.P., Adl, S., Simpson, A.G.B. y Worm, B. 2011. How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biology 9(8): e1001127, 8 pp. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127
Müller-Wille, S. 2007. Collection and collation: theory and practice of Linnean botany. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38: 541-562. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.010
Müller-Wille, S. y Reeds, K. 2007. A translation of Carl Linnaeus’s introduction to Genera plantarum (1737). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38: 563-572. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.003
Muñoz-Rodríguez, P. (+ 14 coautores). 2019. A taxonomic monograph of Ipomea integrated across phylogenetic scales. Nature Plants, 5: 1136-1144. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41477-019-0535-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0535-4
Orr, M.C., Ascher, J.S., Bai, M., Chesters, D. y Zhu, C.-D. 2020. Three questions: How can taxonomists survive and thrive worldwide? Megataxa, 1: 19-27. https://www.biotaxa.org/megataxa/article/view/megataxa.1.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.4
Pielke, R. 2010. In retrospect: Science – The Endless Frontier. Nature, 466: 922-923. https://www.nature.com/articles/466922a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466922a
Renner, S.S. 2016. A return to Linnaeus’ focus on diagnosis, not description: the use of DNA characters in the formal naming of species. Systematic Biology, 65: 1085-1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw032
Riedel, A., Sagata, K., Suharjono, Y.R., Tänzler, R. y Balke, M. 2013a. Integrative taxonomy on the fast track – towards mores sustainability in biodiversity research. Frontiers in Zoology, 10: 15, 9 pp. www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/10/1/15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-10-15
Riedel, A., Sagata, K., Suharjono, Y.R., Tänzler, R. y Balke, M. 2013b. One hundred and one species of Trigonopterus weevils from New Guinea. ZooKeys, 280: 1-150. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.280.3906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.280.3906
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I. 2018. Reseña de libro: The Lost Species: Great Expeditions in the Collections of Natural History Museums. Christopher Kemp, Univ. Chicago Press, 2017. Biología y Sociedad, 1: 84-88. https://issuu.com/biologiaysociedad/docs/biologiaysociedadn2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/bys1.2-45
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I. 2019. Reflexiones sobre cómo llegar a ser un buen taxónomo. Biología y Sociedad, 2: 4-18. https://issuu.com/biologiaysociedad/docs/biologiaysociedadn4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/bys2.4-35
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I. y Carrera-Parra, L.F. 1998. Taxonomía biológica, factor de impacto y evaluación curricular para el siglo XXI. Interciencia, 23(5): 1-7 www.interciencia.org/v23_05/salazar.pdf.
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I., Carrera-Parra, L.F., González, N.E. y Salazar-González, S.A. 2014. Biota portuaria y taxonomía; pp 33-54 In Especies Invasoras Acuáticas: Casos de Estudio en Ecosistemas de México. Low-Pfeng, A.M., Quijón, P.A. & Peters-Recagno, E.M. (eds). SEMARNAT, INECC & Univ. Prince Edward Island, México, 643 pp. http://www2.inecc.gob.mx/publicaciones/consultaPublicacion.html?id_pub=713
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I., Escobar-Briones, E., González, N.E., Suárez-Morales, E., Álvarez, F., de León-González J.A. y Hendrickx, M.E. 2007. Iniciativa mexicana en taxonomía: biota marina y costera. Ciencia y Mar, 11(32): 69-77.
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I. y González, N.E. 2016. Crisis múltiples en taxonomía: Implicaciones para la biodiversidad y recomendaciones para mejorar la situación. Códice, Boletín Científico y Cultural del Museo Universitario, Universidad de Antioquia, 17: 42-56. https://issuu.com/muua/docs/c__dice_29_web
Salazar-Vallejo, S.I., González, N.E., Barrientos-Villalobos, J., Carbajal-Márquez, R. y Schmitter-Soto, J.J. 2018. El reto taxonómico de la biodiversidad en México. Biología y Sociedad, 1: 65-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323199463_El_reto_taxonomico_de_la_biodiversidad_en_Mexico DOI: https://doi.org/10.29105/bys1.1-61
Stuessy, T.F. 2009. Paradigms in biological classification (1707-2007): Has anything really changed? Taxon, 58: 68-76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27756825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.581010
TDPWG (Taxonomy Decadal Plan Working Group). 2018. Discovering Biodiversity: A Decadal Plan for Taxonomy and Biosystematics in Australia and New Zealand 2018-2028. Australian Academy of Sciences y Royal Society Te Aparangi: Canberra y Wellington, 63 pp.
Young, H.S., McCauley, D.J., Galetti, M. y Dirzo, R. 2016. Patterns, causes, and consequences of Anthropocene defaunation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 47: 333-358. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054142
Wheeler, Q. 2020. A taxonomic renaissance in three acts. Megataxa, 1:4-8. https://www.biotaxa.org/megataxa/article/view/megataxa.1.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.1.1.2
Wilcox, K.A. 2016. Clearing the path on the Endless Frontier. University of Kansas, Merrill Advanced Studies Center, Research Retreat, 2016: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.17161/merrill.2016.7765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/merrill.2016.7765
